![causality principle causality principle](https://f4.bcbits.com/img/0016965875_10.jpg)
![causality principle causality principle](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/bc410d5a22136e43ebac4164baac28c9d6b99a04/3-Figure3-1.png)
Hand, I did have the power to get hold of it. For though I didn’t actually have the $20 on $20 bill ready to hand but I do have at least $20 credit in my bankĪccount, you might say that what was in the effect was in that case in Of the form or pattern of having a $20 bill, and I caused you toīecome another instance of that form or pattern. You to have it, what is in the effect was in the cause formally, to When I myself have a $20 bill ready to hand and I cause But if none of these ways areĪgain, these are different ways in which the cause may have what is in Personally to manufacture my own $20 bills. That $20 I somehow convince Congress to pass a law which permits me Or to take an even moreįarfetched scenario, suppose that in order to guarantee that you get Treasury printing press and I get him to run off an Or I may not have even that, but I amĪble to borrow the $20 from someone else, or work for it, so that IĬan go on to give it to you. Or I may have no money in my wallet, but do have $20 in my bankĪccount and write you a check. Might have a $20 bill in my wallet, or two $10 bills, or four $5īills. Now there are several ways in which I might have it. Way I can cause that effect is if I have the $20 to give you in theįirst place. Your having the $20, and I am the cause of this effect. Suppose, for example, that I give you $20. This is sometimes called the principle of proportionate For a cause cannot give what it does not have to Point to make about cause and effect is that whatever is in someĮffect must in some way or other be in the cause, even if not always This is sometimes called the principle of causality. When something is either changed or caused to exist, a potential isĪctualized, and that something already actual must be what actualizes Let’s now say a little more about cause and effect. He gives an example, but from the example I'm still not clear what the precise definition is supposed to be, or even what the difference between eminent and virtual causes are supposed to be. I'm having trouble understanding what precisely virtual and eminent causes (of a form) are. On pages 32-33 he introduces the principle of proportionate causality (PPC).
![causality principle causality principle](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327583545/figure/fig3/AS:675669553983489@1538103583028/Third-conceptual-map-including-impulse_Q320.jpg)
I'm reading Edward Feser's book Five Proofs of the Existence of God.